Decompose
Telotia breaks the document into atomic claims, down to the level where each one can be checked on its own. Not paragraphs. Individual propositions, each independently verifiable.
Every statement in your CAPA, checked against the evidence.
Bring your CAPA and the records behind it. Each statement comes back cited to its evidence, or flagged where the evidence is missing. You still sign off; you just stop hunting for page numbers.
Statement-by-statement
Evidence traceability
Gap detection
TELOTIA REVIEW
capa_2026_0178 / class_ii_infusion_pump
human review required
CAPA review / corrective-action record
The CAPA identifies the affected device model and lot range.
Claim graph / citation path
Verdict queue
The CAPA identifies the affected device model and lot range.claim-018 / CAPA §2.1
Supported
Corrective actions address every root cause named in the investigation.claim-027 / Investigation §4
Partial
The design change was validated under the current QMSR.claim-041 / No cited passage
Unsupported
Evidence search / scoped to supplied corpus
Each claim is matched only against the 47 files you supplied, never the open web.
matching · claim-018: CAPA identifies the affected device model and lot range
Investigation report · root-cause analysis§2.1 · model + lot range
match
openFDA · recall recordrecall notice · affected lots
match
MAUDE adverse eventsprior 24 months · adverse events
partial
Design history file · validationindexed · no direct hit
silent
Validation reports · V&Vno validation record found
no match
Search is scoped to what you trust and can cite. The open web is never queried.
Verdict queue / run summary
18 claims graded. Each links back to its source.
Supported
11
Partial
4
Unsupported
3
The CAPA identifies the affected device model and lot range.claim-018 / CAPA §2.1
Supported
Corrective actions address every root cause named in the investigation.claim-027 / Investigation §4
Partial
The design change was validated under the current QMSR.claim-041 / No cited passage
Unsupported
“Unsupported” means the corpus is silent on the claim, not that the claim is wrong.
Proof package / draft bundle
CAPA-2026-0178 · infusion pump · evidence bundle
capa_2026_0178 · drafted 09:45:06
The CAPA identifies the affected device model and lot range.cited · CAPA §2.1
Supported
Corrective actions address every root cause named in the investigation.cited · Investigation §4 · reviewer note
Partial
The design change was validated under the current QMSR.flagged · no cited passage in corpus
Unsupported
Human review required before submission · proof bundle draft ready
This bundle supports proof preparation. It does not grant regulatory approval or replace qualified human review.
Verdict queue
Supported
claim-018
Claim
The CAPA identifies the affected device model and lot range.
How the claim is read
What the corpus says
State
verdictSupported
sourceCAPA report / §2.1
statusCited · supported by corpus
Actions
◎ View source passage
See related claims
Process
How it works
Decompose. Search. Grade.
From product documentation to reviewable proof, every claim is separated, searched, graded, and linked back to source evidence.
Search the evidence
Each claim is matched against your evidence base, the corpus you supplied, not the open web. The search is scoped to what you trust and can cite.
Grade and cite
Every claim gets a graded verdict: Supported, Partial, or Unsupported. Each linked to the exact source in your corpus. No aggregate scores, no summaries.
Verdict
Evidence outcomes
Four outcomes. None of them a pass or fail.
Telotia never collapses a statement to true or false. It shows where the evidence backs it, where it falls short, where it conflicts, and where the record is simply silent.
Verdict space · drag to pan · click empty to add · click a chain to falsify
supported
Found
The evidence backs the statement. Telotia retrieves the passage and cites it exactly.
partial
Incomplete
Part is backed; part is not, or holds only under specific conditions. Graded, never collapsed to true or false.
contradicted
Conflicting
The record points the other way. Evidence in the corpus conflicts with the statement, with the citation to prove it.
unsupported
None on file
The corpus is silent on the statement, not that it is wrong. A starting point for your reviewer, not a verdict on the work.
Glossary
Glossary
The review vocabulary stays narrow.
These terms anchor the proof package. They keep the interface precise, especially when a human reviewer needs to audit how a verdict was reached.
NounAtomic claim
A single proposition that can be checked independently. Telotia decomposes documents to this level before searching.
NounEvidence base
The corpus you supply and trust. Telotia checks claims against this, not the open web. You choose what counts as evidence.
NounDecomposition
Breaking a document into its individual atomic claims, each independently checkable. The first step before any search or grading.
Workspace
Workspace
Inspect each claim before sign-off.
The interactive mockup shows the review surface as document work: claim graph, verdict queue, source passage, and audit trail.
Demo
See it run
Watch the review happen, claim by claim.
Give Telotia a document and a body of evidence you trust. It breaks the document into individual claims and shows you, claim by claim, what the evidence supports, and what it does not.
Live reviewexample corpus
Supported
The CAPA identifies the affected device model and lot range.
CAPA report / §2.1
Partial
Corrective actions address every root cause named in the investigation.
Investigation / §4
Unsupported
Open the interactive run ↓
The design change was validated under the current QMSR.
No cited passage- 1
Load the document set
Drop in the document; Telotia extracts every atomic claim automatically.
- 2
Search the trusted corpus
Each claim is matched only against the evidence you supplied, never the open web.
- 3
Grade and cite
Supported, Partial, or No support found. Each linked to the exact source passage.
- “No support found” means this corpus is silent on the claim, not that the claim is wrong. Results are a starting point for a human reviewer, not a verdict on the work.
Research
Research
The method, and the benchmark we are building.
A claims-validation tool should hold itself to the same standard. Here is how the review works, and how it will be measured: method first, numbers when they exist.
How it works
Decompose, search, grade
Telotia breaks a document into atomic claims, matches each against the corpus you supplied, not the open web, and returns a graded verdict linked to its source.
See the steps → In progressAn open benchmark
An open benchmark, measuring how well Telotia separates supported claims from unsupported ones, is in progress. The method and results will be published here, including where it falls short.
Get in touch → Why a corpusBuilt on evidence you can check
The showcase runs on a fixed, trusted body of research that stands on its own, demonstrating the general capability: any document, any trusted corpus you choose.
See it run →
Paid pilot
Request a pilot.
Telotia runs as a guided paid pilot. There is no public download yet. Tell us what you are preparing and we will set up a review on your own documents.
Telotia supports evidence review and proof preparation. It does not grant regulatory approval or replace qualified human review.
Prefer email? hello@telotia.com